[ad_1]
Would You Rather #33
by DaebakGrits
In dramaland, leading ladies often find themselves torn between the love of two equally attractive men — a choice none of us would want to make! But what if you did have to pick between the frustrating lawyer and the adorkable police officer? In this weekly feature, we ask you to make the difficult decisions — and we aren’t limiting our options to dreamy oppas.
Vote via the poll and feel free to use the comments to explain exactly how you were able to choose! So, Beanies:
WOULD YOU RATHER #32 RESULTS
Well, well, well, Beanies. You surprised me a bit this time. Since you’ve already established yourself as a mostly introverted bunch (see previous poll results), I was fully expecting the majority of you to opt for a closet full of athleisure — even if the tracksuits are tacky and covered in sequins. I underestimated how money-motivated you all were, though, and based on the comments, it seems that @kmoon79 and many others were fully prepared to star in a cringey commercial if the payout increased their bank accounts.
Of course, money wasn’t the only motivating factor. Several of you indicated you were excited to get your 15 minutes of fame. @hopefulromantic, for example, was eager to star in an “EPIC commercial that goes viral,” and as @welh640 pointed out, the potentially embarrassing commercial would show a willingness to act in roles that others would find less appealing, which could open the door for future acting gigs. Plus, worst case scenario, according to @jls943, everyone will forget about the commercial in a few weeks — assuming it doesn’t become a viral meme.
But there were still a lot of tracksuit-loving Beanies who made up nearly 36% of the vote. Among them, there were Beanies like @kaddicted and @sspat, who would prefer to “fly under the radar” instead of star in a commercial that would live forever on the internet. Others, however, believe “‘ugly’ is only in the eye of the beholder” (@britney) and would much rather have a comfy wardrobe.
RELATED POSTS
[ad_2]
Source link
